if everyone done this the system would collapse and perhaps we would
get back to the idea of one law for everyone.
Also I have passed on the guide for dealing with the police by the
sadly outed Nightjack.
When the government hates u , u have to fight back.

“Case dismissed”

Alan Douglas

I think that might constitute a hate crime.

And, guess what, the very same people http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/11/victory-for-free-speech-in-gay-hate-law.html who lauded the defeat of the British amendment, because of their “religious convictions”, are also celebrating the passing of the Lithuanian law http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/11/lithuania-incurs-eu-wrath-for-law.html. This is direct evidence that the dedication of most of these Christians to Free Speech is actually wafer thin, and is only a pretext to further their own goals. There just isn’t enough hatred in the world; they will be on the steps of the guillotine, behind Gordon Brown and Harriet Harperson, but in front of Pope Benedict.

I know, depressing, isn’t it? The colour will change, but we will still have rank corruption instead of government.

Integrity is a dirty word among the political class. In fact it has been redefined by them as ‘not getting caught’.

FLS, various lobbies have indeed become incredibly powerful, but don’t think for a second that the Conservatives aren’t lining up their own lobbyists-led agenda.

Faustie, really interesting point about people growing up in this climate. It wasn’t that long ago that freedom of speech was in a much healthier state, but if you weren’t there to see it and experience it then would you really notice when free speech is curbed again?

By Labour’s reckoning, the Tories might undo some of their dirty work, but not all, if history is to repeat itself. They are probably correct.

Thus, with each passing administration, we lose more of our rights until the next generation, starved of history lessons, have no idea what freedom is and don’t miss it.

They’re playing a long game.

Large companies and well funded / organised minority interest groups have set the agenda for the last decade or more.

So wWhere’s the legal protection for victims of state instituted heterophobia?

@ LFAT it is wonderfully ironic that a party obsessed with equality spends so much of its time telling us how different we are from one another.

That’s the rub isn’t it?

To you or I, or indeed most right-thinking people, equality is about treating everyone the same. To the ideologists of the left who inform this debate/govt, they view everyone as a member of a sub group who they wish to treat differently in an attempt to manipulate the *outcomes* to what they (politically) believe are equal ends. So, for example, rather than engaging with muslims, and everyone else, as citizens of the UK, they prefer to treat them as a homogenous bloc and deal only with their self appointed (oft islamist) leaders in the MCB. Rather than deal with individual homosexuals as equal victims before the law, it suits them to treat them as a homogenous bloc in need of special treatment to overcome what their politics tells them is a bias in outcomes.

Its the ‘positive discrimination’ approach which looks to equalise outcomes against perceived structural discrimination by deliberately discriminating IN FAVOUR of the group you want to bring up. Intellectually, I find this bankrupt, morally and logically, since it basically says that two wrongs do add up to a right.

And then they complain about diminishing social cohesion, entirely without irony, while treating people as different and unequal based on their race, gender, orientation or religion and then wonder loudly where the proles get these ideas of difference from!