The problem is that if you give someone the right to speak out anonymously, you deny someone else the right to say in reply, “I know who you are … you’re X!” Not exactly fair either?

Further explained on my own site (including several earlier postings).

However, “and advised “decent” members of the public under police investigation to “complain about every officer . . . show no respect to the legal system or anybody working in it.”” Is tantamount to insighting revolt and rebellion, and encouraging people to do things they might not otherwise do, based upon an argueably half baked fact that you cannot justify or prove.

We are anonymous bloggers too that have taken on the corrruption and fraud in the investment property world and have gone to great lengths to protect our anonymity to prevent reprisals. When writing though, we are certain and can provide proof of every comment we make, or if we state opinion, we make it very clear that that is exactly what it is.

P Foster would have done well to read this when he was confronted at his door by the boys in blue

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1531307/Student-barred-over-sex-film.html Patrick Foster Peeping Tom

Because of the internet, I only buy a newspaper now to get Mrs Specialone her puzzles. I have read so much rubbish in newspapers, have been subject to scandalous lies by MSM in the past too.

I now prefer to get the ‘truth’ from serious bloggers. I actually know people who believe everything that BBC news says!