One rule for Islam, another rule for everyone else (again)
So, let me just clarify something – we want hateful, anti-British Muslims to stay IN this country, but we want to keep people like Geert Wilders OUT ?
I would now like to repeat the reasons offered by the Home Office as to why Geert Wilders was kept out, but this time substitute out any reference to Geert Wilders and replace it with reference to these dispicable Muslims instead:
To Geert Wilders: in the view of Jacqui Smith “your presence in the UK would pose a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society. …Jacqui Smith is satisfied that your statements about Muslims and their beliefs, as expressed in your film Fitna and elsewhere, would threaten community harmony and therefore public security in the UK”.
To these Muslims: in the view of Jacqui Smith “your presence in the UK [poses] a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society. …Jacqui Smith is satisfied that your statements about [British soldiers], as expressed in your [protest yesterday], would threaten community harmony and therefore public security in the UK”.
And the difference is……?
And the difference is……?
Probably that these scumbags are British subjects and, since WW2, it is frowned on to strip people of citizenship and expel them on the basis of their religion. We should, however, see about arresting them or get some of the shadier bits of the state to see about arranging an accident for them.
I thought you were going to comment that not one of the Muslim protesters was arrested.
I can only find confirmation of this in the Sun – Two people were arrested. “But NONE of the bile-spouting fanatics was held by police”.
You didn’t so I will.
And the difference is………..?
I very much doubt any of those were born here,they all look middle eastern.Can you revoke british citizenship?
Even more converts to the bnp.Moslems are becoming hated all over the world.We need to start putting pressure on goverment,real lawwful pressure,not just whinging on blogs.
John, point taken. Can you imagine how many people would have been arrested if they protested at a Muslim event, calling them terrorists and baby killers?
Admittedly Gordon Brown went some way to condemning the protests but of course he will go no further.
“Admittedly Gordon Brown went some way to condemning the protests..”
Yes, I’d say it took courage, but, well….
A fascinating comment from the Spectator which rather ups the ante: -
http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/3430231/the-luton-protest.thtml
“A state that refuses to prosecute for treason those of its citizens who actively assist those who are fighting it is betraying itself”
So are we agin them because they are muslims or because of their protest? What would we do if they had been white anglo saxons protesting?
I’m against them for a number of reasons:
Firstly they are hypocrites- they don’t want peace, they want Islamofacists to win. In Afghanistan. In Iraq. In London. Everywhere. So they are protesting that their side lost.
Secondly I am against them because they are dunderheaded theocrats peddling an archaic ‘faith’ based around the behaviour of a mysoginist pedophile warlord.
Finally, I oppose them because actually, they promote violence. WHen an atheist tells you to go to hell, he means ‘f*ck off’. When an Islamist Theocrat tells you to go to hell, he means ‘I want to kill you and PUT you in hell myself’. And I loathe the police for stopping them getting lynched.