Harriet Harman makes it so easy to despise her
Dear Harriet Harman,
What a shocker. What an incredibly naive piece of propoganda. Your speech at the TUC conference yesterday made several things abundantly clear to me: you are out of touch, you are desperate to reignite your core vote and – most importantly of all – you are not learning the lessons that history has provided you with. I guarantee you that your attempt to reignite class war in this country will come back to hurt you.
When our economy is falling apart, unemployment is rising, house prices are plummeting and fuel prices are rocketing, one might think that you would concentrate on reassuring the public that the government has it all figured out. Instead, you decided to wind back the political clock by saying that people’s life chances are impacted by “where they were born, what kind of family they were born into, where they live and their wealth”. Interestingly, you dropped the word ‘class’ from the text of your speech when it was delivered. Could it be that you are well aware Labour will turn off millions of voters by harking back to decades gone by? Stoking the fires of class warfare may seem like a good strategy for bringing the Labour voters back home, but you obviously haven’t been paying much attention to British politics over the last year. If you had read a paper or two in that time, you would know that Labour’s defeats in Crewe and Nantwich and the Mayoral elections were due in no small part to Labour’s class warfare – which the voters were appalled by. The simple lesson that ‘class warfare doesn’t work’ is seemingly lost on you.
Not only is class warfare crass, there is a wonderful irony that it should be you (niece of the Countess of Longford, no less) who is so keen to fan the flames. After all, you sent your children to a grammar school and a grant-maintained school – something which I doubt was received well among the Labour benches – and having been to St Pauls Girls School, one of the most prestigious private schools in the country, I would have thought you’d know better. I appreciate that when each and every poll shows Labour in dire straits, your natural reaction would be to run to your core vote, but let me give you some friendly advice. The Conservatives were destroyed at the 1997 and were left scratching their heads about where to go next. Like you, they chose to focus on rebuilding their core vote and this was reflected in their enormous (and, in hindsight, poorly chosen) emphasis on Europe and immigration. While these issues were important at the time and remain so today, they demonstrated to the public that the Conservatives were narrow-minded and unable to relate to voters. You are more than welcome to pursue the same strategy but don’t say I didn’t warn you. Labour is already heading for one crushing electoral defeat and if you choose to focus on class warfare, I suspect this may be magnified into two or three general election losses.
Social mobility is about education. In this country, it is widely acknowledged that to get a top-quality education, you often have to pay for it. Social mobility has floundered under a Labour government because, despite all your protestations about increasing pass rates and record exam results, nothing has changed. Tony Blair realised this, yet his own party strangled the life out of every education reform he put in place and Gordon Brown has since put the final nails in the coffins of each policy. One wonders where you could have missed the point any more even if you tried.
Yours sincerely,
A.Tory








The last paragraph is very telling.
How does the government claim to lift 1 million children from poverty yet then claim that this ’social mobility’ hasn’t helped them and more must be done.
I know you aren’t keen on faith schools but the results speak for themselves. It may be a very imperfect system but the idea of the likes of the NUT to abolish them to allow everyone to be equal is madness.
Labour’s equality means equally bad for all.
TB did try to address this, but someone wasn’t keen to fund it.
Interesting that you should mention the poverty issue. Labour’s claims may well be true in terms of statistics, but they have done this through throwing tax credits at those just below 60% of median income (the cut-off for being ‘in poverty’), while the number of people in ‘deep poverty’ (less than 40% of the median income) has risen every year under Labour. It’s just a statistical trick and explains why social mobility has not altered despite their claims of success.
Abolishing faith schools has nothing to do with making people ‘equal’ – surely you know how much I hate the suggestion that anyone on the planet is equal! It’s about breaking down barriers between groups within the same community, because these barriers necessarily result in ignorance and intolerance. Improving the standards of schools by freeing them from LEA control, supported by a secular philosophy that respects and supports everyone, is the best way to improve social mobility.
I wonder if there is something even more sinister at work here. The left have created this new equality commission and are busy adding this to its remit ( like perhaps social mobility ).
Now that positive discrimination is going to become law it won’t take much for this commission to start telling who get education, health care, jobs etc based on its own left wing criteria.
Its beginning to look like an instrument for oppression.
I know what you mean. Doesn’t anyone else think it’s rather strange that Harriet Harman has set up the ‘Women and Equality Unit’:
http://www.equalities.gov.uk/about/ministers.htm
Notice that it’s not the ‘Equality Unit’, it’s the ‘Women and Equality Unit’.
That tells me all I need to know about this government’s contempt for a meritocracy and how they are desperate to reopen old wounds (even those which are healing nicely), be it gender or class wars, just to get a few more votes.
However she’s stalking about equality in relation to social mobility – that implies to me that the same tools are going to be used on both ‘problems’. ( Though I have to say that a lot of guff is talked about social mobility. )
Here a little bit more of the picture: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/education/2798968/Universities-have-a-duty-to-promote-social-justice-says-John-Denham.html , I think if this government were in power for another term we would start to move in the direction of the old communist regimes in Eastern Europe where you political localities determine what job and promotion you get.
[...] trust a hippy is annoyed by lovey actresses who stereotype working class women on screen. Letter from a Tory berates Harriet Harman for a speech making stereotypical statements about background whilst [...]