How dare local councils abuse their power in this way
Dear Simon Milton,
I think that a reality check is in order. As Chairman of the Local Government Association, I was hoping that you would be as angered as I am about the news that local authorities abused anti-terror laws to launch almost 10,000 spying campaigns last year and also lodged over half a million requests for personal communication data. To say that I was ‘disappointed’ by your response has got to be the biggest understatement I have ever produced in a letter.
Far from criticising the councils, you have insisted that the powers were necessary to deal with legitimate concerns from local people, and that ”without these powers, councils would not be able to provide the level of reassurance and protection local people demand and deserve.” Reassurance? REASSURANCE? Are you out of your mind? Who on earth is going to be “reassured” that you are spying on our telephone calls and emails to investigate crimes as petty as underage smoking and dog poo? Well?! Needless to say, our pathetic Prime Minister has bottled it again and launched a review of the situation (to be completed in the Autumn, when he hopes everyone will have forgotten about this) instead of going in front of the media and immediately repealing the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) until such time as the powers given to deal with terrorism and serious crime are restricted to precisely those areas and nothing else.
It is terrifying to think that these “directed surveillance authorisations” can be approved by a junior town hall official instead of a judge. In effect, unqualified idiotic bureaucrats determine whether your stupid local authorities can spy on people. It’s not often I find myself agreeing with the Lib Dems, but Chris Huhne got it spot on when he said that this was another example of “the creeping Orwellian state” introduced by Labour, and “measures that were intended to be used to fight terrorism and organised crime have instead been used to snoop on ordinary people’s children, dogs and bins.” For you to also expect sympathy towards local councils is absolutely unbelievable. I don’t see you can defend local councils by saying that they are “between a rock and a hard place” when they are so openly abusing powers that were never intended for them in the first place.
Honestly, the dismissive approach of this government towards civil liberties is getting too much to bear. Bring back David Davis.
Yours contemptfully,
A.Tory








Witanagemot Blogs






I agree. Its astonishing that petty bureaucrats who might for example be your neighbours can look at your emails and websites..
I am contemplating A Day of Protest a “Send a Defamatory/Inflammatory of otherwise illegal email day ” – to get a few hundred thousand people to send emails to provoke the authorities…
If you feel like venting your anger, you could always join Devils Kitchen for a walk….
http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2008/07/going-for-little-walk.html
What sort of Email do you have in mind Mutley?
A fake spending grant scam on the lines of the Nigerian general?
Get cheap wheelie bins from BinMed Canada?
Spoof new equality laws purporting to be from the home secretary?
Or just general abuse?
Do let us know.
Careful, Bill – it might be hard to tell spoof equality laws apart from the real ones.
I totally agree with you. I have said the same.
Sad how so many people are appalled by this kind of behaviour, yet the government is unmoved.
Personally I think it ridiculous that the local council has to count photographing dog owners in the process of letting their dogs leave heaps of s*** around as “use of anti-terrorist powers”
Personally I’m all for summary execution on the spot of dog-owners who don’t clear up after their dogs and hanging their bodies from the nearer no-fouling sign as a warning.
It’s not that councils are miss-using these powers it’s that perfectly sensible actions to control anti-social cretins are being miss-classified.