<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s about time private schools did more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lettersfromatory.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lettersfromatory.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/</link>
	<description>Daily views on British politics and the Conservative Party from a centre-right thinker who writes letters on his blog to politicians, journalists and many others.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:37:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Madeley</title>
		<link>http://www.lettersfromatory.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>&quot;So, they just try to spoil it for those who are fortunate enough to be enjoying an excellent education.&quot;

And right there we see the fear at the heart of the issue. Anyone who&#039;s family can&#039;t afford to send them to private school will obviously spoil it for everyone else, presumably for being intellectually subnormal hoodies who roam the corridors looking for &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; people to go stabby on.

&quot;I’m not a socialist and I believe that private schools have every right to exist.&quot;

I &lt;em&gt;am&lt;/em&gt; a Socialist, and I believe that private schools have every right to exist.

&quot;If you push them too far for political reasons, They will opt out... What then? Give the state a legal monopoly on providing all education?&quot;

So these successful businesses will just pick up their balls and go home if pushed to far?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, they just try to spoil it for those who are fortunate enough to be enjoying an excellent education.&#8221;</p>
<p>And right there we see the fear at the heart of the issue. Anyone who&#8217;s family can&#8217;t afford to send them to private school will obviously spoil it for everyone else, presumably for being intellectually subnormal hoodies who roam the corridors looking for <em>real</em> people to go stabby on.</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m not a socialist and I believe that private schools have every right to exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>I <em>am</em> a Socialist, and I believe that private schools have every right to exist.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you push them too far for political reasons, They will opt out&#8230; What then? Give the state a legal monopoly on providing all education?&#8221;</p>
<p>So these successful businesses will just pick up their balls and go home if pushed to far?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.lettersfromatory.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>Well said.  The use of the word &quot;isolationist&quot; is very poignant as well as accurate.

Private school education is indeed excellent, which is why we must try to encourage that excellence to spread rather than driving it away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.  The use of the word &#8220;isolationist&#8221; is very poignant as well as accurate.</p>
<p>Private school education is indeed excellent, which is why we must try to encourage that excellence to spread rather than driving it away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally C</title>
		<link>http://www.lettersfromatory.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>If private schools did not have charitable status they would be able to register for VAT. They would then be able to reclaim the VAT on all their expenditure. It has been estimated that this would go along way to compensating them for the removal of the charitable ststus benefits.
One private school head wrote to The Times some months ago pointing this out. If you push them too far for political reasons, They will opt out of C. status and you will lose the benefits that many areas gain from the current arrangements of co-operation.
What then?
Give the state a legal monopoly on providing all education? Good move? That will be great for Britain! No chance of winning the rugby world cup again! Thouands of extra kids to pay for.
The really isolationist schools should be encouraged to change their ways. The ones that participate should be appreciated. The British Private education system is the best and most successful education system in the world. Let us make sure Britain can continue to draw on it and use is as abenchmark to whip our Governments with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If private schools did not have charitable status they would be able to register for VAT. They would then be able to reclaim the VAT on all their expenditure. It has been estimated that this would go along way to compensating them for the removal of the charitable ststus benefits.<br />
One private school head wrote to The Times some months ago pointing this out. If you push them too far for political reasons, They will opt out of C. status and you will lose the benefits that many areas gain from the current arrangements of co-operation.<br />
What then?<br />
Give the state a legal monopoly on providing all education? Good move? That will be great for Britain! No chance of winning the rugby world cup again! Thouands of extra kids to pay for.<br />
The really isolationist schools should be encouraged to change their ways. The ones that participate should be appreciated. The British Private education system is the best and most successful education system in the world. Let us make sure Britain can continue to draw on it and use is as abenchmark to whip our Governments with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.lettersfromatory.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>State schools certainly need a lot of attention, but private schools should do more to help.  I&#039;m not a socialist and I believe that private schools have every right to exist.  Having said that, private schools are not businesses, as you stated.  They are in fact charities and were awarded their charitable status because they provided a &#039;public benefit&#039;, which they evidently do not.

So, the choices are (a) take away their charitable status, which will cost private schools over £100m, (b) make them do more for the wider community, or (c) both of the above.  Personally I think (c) is an acceptable move but (b) is certainly less controversial and many people will agree with it, regardless of their political allegiances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State schools certainly need a lot of attention, but private schools should do more to help.  I&#8217;m not a socialist and I believe that private schools have every right to exist.  Having said that, private schools are not businesses, as you stated.  They are in fact charities and were awarded their charitable status because they provided a &#8216;public benefit&#8217;, which they evidently do not.</p>
<p>So, the choices are (a) take away their charitable status, which will cost private schools over £100m, (b) make them do more for the wider community, or (c) both of the above.  Personally I think (c) is an acceptable move but (b) is certainly less controversial and many people will agree with it, regardless of their political allegiances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sepoyagent</title>
		<link>http://www.lettersfromatory.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>sepoyagent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/its-about-time-private-schools-did-more/#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Sorry but I don&#039;t agree.   &quot;Private&quot; schools are businesses just like any other business.   They are selling an education to willing buyers.  Why should they be expected to do more for the community, to offer places free of charge, (other than where they have themselves chosen to give bursaries usually as a result of the generosity in later life of those who attended the school).   Why should they be expected to share their facilities, ie their assets, with people who are not their customers.
As with so much of the socialist nonsense put forward by this government and its quangos, these moves are based on pure envy.
&quot;If we can&#039;t go to these schools, nobody else should be able to.&quot;
So, they just try to spoil it for those who are fortunate enough to be enjoying an excellent education.
Instead of these vindictive measures, they should concentrate on improving state schools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but I don&#8217;t agree.   &#8220;Private&#8221; schools are businesses just like any other business.   They are selling an education to willing buyers.  Why should they be expected to do more for the community, to offer places free of charge, (other than where they have themselves chosen to give bursaries usually as a result of the generosity in later life of those who attended the school).   Why should they be expected to share their facilities, ie their assets, with people who are not their customers.<br />
As with so much of the socialist nonsense put forward by this government and its quangos, these moves are based on pure envy.<br />
&#8220;If we can&#8217;t go to these schools, nobody else should be able to.&#8221;<br />
So, they just try to spoil it for those who are fortunate enough to be enjoying an excellent education.<br />
Instead of these vindictive measures, they should concentrate on improving state schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
